Showing posts with label Guest writer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Guest writer. Show all posts

Friday, 20 February 2015

Of Caste and Outcaste – Attempt to diagnose the roots of oppression

Please welcome guest writer* Saiswaroopa Iyer. In this passionately written piece, she examines the interstices between caste and power, and ponders on the instrumentality of the varna system in systemic oppression today. You can follow and interact with her on Twitter via her handle @Sai_swaroopa. A Venture analyst by profession, Sai is a dreamer at heart and an aspiring author. She is enthusiastic and passionate about Indian epics, history, literature and classical music. She dreams of a life where reading, writing and singing form the way of life.  


We got rid of the caste system, but not caste-ism” This was an anguished admission of a dear friend of mine whose views generally clash with mine. Yes, in today’s world of hurried and forced labels, one can call him a ‘liberal’ and me, a ‘conservative’. The context of the conversation was based on the electoral dynamics where certain castes end up being the vote banks. I often wondered if I was among the finite minority that cringed every time electoral results are analyzed on TV screens with caste dynamics over riding the real issues. (May be, one could get philosophical and argue about what is real and what is not!)

 My liberal friend and I share a view in common, that we would like to see these lines of caste disappear in our respective ideal worlds. Yes, discrimination is a disease, a disease which requires the medicine of social reformation.  But here I come to the point where I would differ from my friends on the other side of the imaginary line of liberalism. The point is about the diagnosis of the disease. Much of the literature on the social dynamics lays blame on the Hindu fourfold Varna system.  I find the famous line of purusha sukta being quoted with a lot of zeal to prove that discrimination existed right in Vedic texts.

The ones that lay the blame do conveniently forget the openness of the interpretation that the Vedic texts have. My spiritual guru, Bhagawan Sri Sathya Sai Baba had advocated many times that service to the lowest strata of the society is the real ‘pada puja’ made to the universal Lord.

Interpretations and politics apart, I think that the much blamed chaturvarna system died a long while ago. I call it a dead system as the social dynamics of the Varna system had long turned porous and post the dark ages and before the invasions from the middle east, we do have many instances of new dynasties being founded independent of the ‘four-fold’ sanction. The Mauryas, the Guptas, the Shatavahanas, the Kakatiyas and many such empires made a mark in the history defying the much blamed sanction. May be there was no strict sanction and power dynamics redefined the sanction? I would leave it to the historians and period scholars to determine it. The founding of a new empire was often based on pulling down another empire where mostly the King had turned oppressive and unpopular. Empires used to reach the peaks of glory when they balanced the expansion of land with administrative reforms that left the citizens happy. They often reached their peril due to oppressive rule that galvanized a revolution or due to strategic mistakes which gave their rivals an upper hand.

Oppression in such cases in my opinion shifted to power dynamics. Those who wielded power (excluding the heroic kings and reformers who we all remember with reverence) oppressed those who were ideologically opposed to them or presented a threat. That is the reason why I feel blaming the purusha sukta for oppression serves no real purpose and is rather a lazy diagnosis of a serious social problem. The ones doing so probably are not accountable to give a solution so can command the luxury of such lazy diagnosis. But it is important for the ones looking for real solutions to get to the real roots of the problem. When I hear of inhuman practices that prevail among India’s lesser accessible areas, my belief is further strengthened. Though not proud of my knowledge of scriptures, I am yet to come across any such inhuman doctrines which forbid the ‘lower’ class from using the common wells in the village and advocate violent things.  

Oppression is always the language of power maniacs and not of the system writers. As repetitive as I might sound with this sentence, I would want the readers to realize this and more. If one throws the blame of oppression on Hinduism, one has to realize that the defying discrimination also belongs to Hinduism more than the imported idealist theories. I refer to the Bhakti movement and the scores of reforms that were achieved by the likes of Mahatma Basaveshwar, Madhvacharya, the Nayanmars of Tamilnadu and the scores of composers who have denounced all forms of birth based discrimination. My personal favourite is the one in Telugu, “Brahmamokkate” by Sri Tallapaka Annamacharya. Those interested can find the complete lyric and meaning here (http://www.karnatik.com/c1107.shtml). There are more compositions of his decrying discrimination and oppression.

One needs to observe that Bhakti movement scored above the recent movements against caste in one thing – restoring the dignity and in preaching universalism that brought the people of various strata together. Sadly the modern movements though rooted in progressive ideals have done little more than casting the oppressed classes into political toys through reverse discrimination. This is the reason why we see clans and communities aspiring for ‘backward’ tag for reservations and other short term benefits. Sadly, this is the greatest harm that the social engineers of the last century have done to our system. I can only hope that the next wave of reformers would take inspiration from those movements which have advocated the oneness and inherent human merit across the divisions rather than those which have capitalized on mutual hatred and reverse oppression.

* I may or may not agree with the views of the guest writer, but I respect their right to be heard.




Friday, 15 August 2014

The Philosophical Roots of Shaktism.


Please welcome guest writer Rajarshri Nandy, a long time participant and support of #SanskritAppreciationHour. After much persuasion, he has agreed to write a piece for this blog. Rajarshi is a  sadhaka whose path includes, but is not limited to KaliKula Shaktism practices and homas (fire rituals). He is an admirer of Sri Aurobindo and Aghori Vimalananda. Kundalini is very difficult to explain in words, Rajarshi confesses, until experienced. Here's hoping all of you will be inspired to walk the path. You can follow him on Twitter via his handle @TheRajarshi.



Philosophical roots of Shaktism.

Among the various paths within Indian spirituality, one of the most important is Shaktism – or the worship of Shakti (Power/Energy) which is personified as the Goddess. The philosophy is known as Shaktism and an adherent of the path is called a ShaktA.  Some believe that this branch of spirituality originated at an ancient time from the root idea called Samkhya, which saw the world as a duality between Purusha – the male principle and Prakriti – the female principle.  While the term Prakriti means Nature in general, the term Shakti specifically indicates energy/power.  Shakti  always invariable involved some form of movement, for manifested energy and power is best understood through the sense of movement, while Purusha indicated that point of stillness or immobility with respect to which the movement is perceivable.  

Shiva therefore represented the ultimate transcendental stillness while Shakti or the Goddess became the sum total of all motions in the Universe. The ShaktAs took this idea to an  extreme  proclaiming that  world as we know it is entirely Shakti.  In one sense they were not wrong. Consider a simple example. At any given point the earth is in motion around the sun; the whole solar system is in motion around the center of the galaxy; the galaxy itself is in motion around some point in the Universe known as the Great Attractor and so on. Therefore our whole existence as a species is subject to a constant play of subtle cosmic movements overlapping with each other in ways which we may not be able to understand consciously.  And therefore the ShaktA scriptures proclaimed that it was the Goddess – Shakti personified – who creates, sustains and destroys this Universe.

Overtime in the course of its natural evolution, Shaktism practically bifurcated into two major schools – the SriKula and KaliKula. SriKula considers Lalita Tripursundari as the main form of the Goddess, while Kalikula considers Kali as the chief form of the Goddess. There were other methods of classification too,  based on geographical regions, but those became less prominent with the passage of time.

Tantra

Though much misunderstood and occasionally reviled, one of the most fascinating offshoots from Shaktism has been Tantra.  Simplistically expressed, Tantra concerns itself with the practical application of Shakti (energy) to achieve certain desired results in the world.  The more esoteric aspects of Tantra deal with the idea and practice of awakening a latent spiritual energy inside the human body which can aid an individual’s spiritual growth. This energy is traditionally referred to as Kundalini Shakti. To achieve this aim Tantra utilizes a wide range of tools like mantras (mystical chants), yantras (mystical diagrams), specific visualizations along with worship of different archetypal forms of the Divine Feminine energy.

Kundalini

Some believe that the idea of Kundalini  was first established as a powerful tool by the Hatha Yogis and Tantric Yogis of the original Naths Parampara. Possibly the earliest reference and explanation of this term comes from Sant Dhyaneshwara’s  exposition of the Srimadbhagwata Gita in Marathi, known as Dhyaneshwari. The knowledge was passed down by competent Gurus to fit disciples. In the last century British writer Arthur Avalon and the Theosophists translated some of the Tantric texts into English. This brought forth the knowledge and idea of Kundalini into the public consciousness in a massive scale.

A textual definition of the term Kundalini refers to the coiled up residual Divine Shakti at base of the human spine, which remains in a ‘sleeping’ state until it is awakened by force of sadhana (spiritual practices) and made to move through the six spinal centers, thus energizing them, until it finally merges with the Absolute, allegorically represented by the thousand-petalled lotus above the head. This, the Tantras said, was Shiva and this fantastic union of Shiva and Shakti- the awakened Kundalini -  results in a most terrific state know as Nirvikalpa Samadhi.


However inspite of mass dissemination and wide use of the term Kundalini, the actual phenomenon still remains as much as mystery today as it was centuries ago. For no understanding of Kundalini is practically possible without an understanding of a related term, ahamkara, of I-ness. Akamkara is the force that binds and holds the human personality to the body and gives it a unique and individualized character. It is what makes each one of us separate and different from the rest of humanity. In order to maintain this personality, with all its various likes/dislikes, habits, tendencies, attachments etc, a tremendous amount of energy (Shakti) is used. By dint of sadhana when this force is made to disengage from its daily and continuous job of maintaining this limited human personality and some part of the energy is freed up, then that free energy becomes the Kundalini Shakti of an individual.  And just like the ahamakara clings to ideas, opinions (of oneself) and attributes of the personality, similarly the free Kundalini  can be made to attach itself to something more subtle and Divine,  like the form  and personality of a Devata.

One of the most important ideas pertaining to the Tantras is that the human personality is not a constant but is a product of various conditionings acquired over many lifetimes along with the environment and experiences of this lifetime. And it can be changed if the conditioning is changed. But this ordinary personality is flawed, ignorant, weak and temporary. The aim therefore is to reconfigure or finish this personality with all this attributes and transform it into a more abiding, eternal, flawless personality from one of the archetypal energies, known as Devatas. And that is possible only when the ahamkara is fully (theoretically speaking) or partially (practically speaking) made to disengaged, or forget its ordinary existence, and align itself to this greater form.  One must slowly dissolve to the mundane in order to get recreated into the spiritual. And naturally such a process is not without its many difficulties, hazaards and dangers, unless one has a strong Guru to guide, either internal or external.

Once the Kundalini is awakened in an individual, as per Tantras, it is then made to self-identify with a form of the Divine Mother who then safely guides the journey of this transformation process. For an awakened Kundalini can also accentuate/blow-up  various pre-existing weaknesses or identify with something other than the Divine and eventually wreck havoc on the individual.  It is because of this danger associated with the process that the ancients would guard this knowledge and made sure that the experience is transmitted only through the medium of a competent Guru who was capable of protecting the disciple from missteps and damage. On the other hand, for the right individual, it was/is one of the fastest means of spiritual progress.  

Sometimes as the Kundalini Shakti passes through the various chakras in the subtle body, it can manifest different supernatural abilities in an individual. But this is not compulsory and varies from person to person. However what definitely happens with a Kundalini awakening is a marked change in the personality and behavior of the individual in some way or the other. New worlds open up and many older ideas and habits and rigid notions can get replaced totally or in parts, and this is easily noticeable to others. In some extreme cases an awakened Kundalini can shoot up straight to the head and produce fantastic spiritual experiences and generate a virakti – detachment and dislike – for the world around. But that is rare. 

One interesting problem with trying to awaken this Shakti is that the more one thinks of Kundalini, lesser the chance of experiencing an awakening. For the I-ness has to learn to forget the constituents of the personality, including mental ideas about ourselves and what we want to be, or not want to be, before Kundalini can awaken. It is difficult to experience the Kundalini, however the far greater difficulty lies in purifying and deconditioning this Shakti until it reaches the Absolute. For that needs a transformation, as opposed to forceful suppression, of the six ripus – Kama (lust), lobha (greed), krodha (anger), mada (arrogance), moha (attachment), jealousy (matsarya) – or energies which distort  the purity of this Shakti. 

Mostly this is lifelong process. The lesser is the ego attachment to these things, the greater is the Shakti available to an individual. Or stronger is the identification of the Kundalini Shakti with the Devata, greater is the manifestation of the Devata’s energy in the sadhaka’s life. No two cases of Kundalini Shakti awakening are exactly equivalent, even though the two people maybe worshiping the same form of the Devata. Therefore, because of the extremely individualistic nature of this path, dogmatic ideas are mostly unhelpful, and may they cause more hindrance to the sadhaka. 

One may wonder why exactly is Kundalini referred to as the Mother in Tantra. Is it mandatory to do so? No it is not, but it is a good safeguard. Shakti, any shakti, is a force almost mechanical in its activity. A knife can cut through anything including the wielder of the knife. And this is no ordinary Shakti but a vast amount of force. By personifying and  indentifying this force with the concept of the Divine Mother assures a protection for the sadhaka against many pitfalls and dangers, for once the bond is forged, indeed it behaves as a mother to a child (the sadhaka).

Though each experience of Kundalini has its own uniqueness, yet there are some broad classification that can be done. Again, to understand this, we have to understand our Ahamakara properly.  This I-ness works not only through our mind, but also through our pranas and the physical body. So depending on which part or parts of the being cause a turning of Ahamkara into Kundalini, will open certain possibilities and limit certain others. This also explain, if properly understood, why in some cases of Kundalini awakening may lead to various kinds of trances, or a remembrance of past lives, or even certain occult abilities. But this is too complex a topic to be dealt with completely in this writeup. Moreover the very act of writing down things whose reality is at a most subtle level can cause much distortion in the idea. Loss in transmission is a very real possibility in such things!

Kundalini in Tantra

Now that we have a basic understanding of what Kundalini maybe, we will see how this helps in Tantra, or  for that matter any other aspect of life. One of the typical features of a powerfully awakening  Kundalini is a tremendous inner concentrated ability of focus. This is way beyond normal powers of concentration. It is infact so intense that it can create a reality or open up occult realities for the sadhaka. Now Tantra deals with the art of using rituals for various purposes. In every ritual there are two components – the rules of the ritual and the Shakti of the individual. Togther they bring success. Which means if a person without sufficient Shakti performs a ritual with perfection, yet it may produce no results. So whenever a person has the freedom to use his own Kundalini Shakti, it gives a strong energy at his disposal which can be used for perfection in any ritual worship, or for that matter many other mundane areas of life. 

This is one of the biggest practical uses of the Kundalini Shakti. All sorts of magical or occult practices succeed based on the usage of this Shakti. Of course, one can turn this entirely to the spiritual realms and not bother with anything mundane, but that is a matter of individual paths. One example best illustrates this point. Once Swami Vivekananda, not yet world famous, had exorcised a haunted house where he and his brother disciples were staying using a fistful of sand from the banks of a river nearby. In most cases that would be an impossible thing to do, but Swami Vivekananda could do it because of the tremendous force of an awakened Kundalini Shakti working through his mind and body. 

Conclusion.

Thinking about awakening Kundalini is often a fruitless exercise. Rather a seeker is better off trying to reduce the impact of the six ripus on his consciousness, such that when an awakening happens, there will be lesser amount of troubles and hazards to deal with. Except for rarest of rare cases, having a competent master/mentor/friend/guide/guru who can help one digest the effects of Kundalini is almost mandatory.








Sunday, 9 February 2014

Prakriti: What is "the truth"?


Please welcome guest writer* Rishi Raj Manglesh, a Senior IT Consultant in the Nordic region. He has a keen interest in Indian studies and is happy to give his perspective on almost everything if it helps... Today he shares his views about the concept of 'satya' often translated into English as 'truth'. But is it as unidimensional as that? Read on to find out. A bit of thinker Rishi Raj enjoy tackling serious questions, so please connect with him for via his twitter handle @rmanglesh





When we try to understand Truth or "Satya", derived from the Sanskrit word Sat, it means that which always exists, unchangeable and consistent. What would it actually mean?

It would mean that truth is the same for me, you and everyone else. Moreover it would also be the same in the past, present and future as well. It is static and also called as Absolute or Eternal truth which doesn't change with time.

But due to limitation of expression and inability to know all at once, we might require a different versions of truth which suits to our context to understand the absolute truth. Such a dynamic narrative which evolves with our spiritual development may be/could be or can be different to me, you or anybody else. Such a truth which is not static but expresses absolute truth can be called Relative truth which changes with time.

------------------

Why truth is so essential to know?

Because it is part of our existence. Our physical being along with the narrative of relative and absolute truth put together is our existence actually. "Our being" is not just physical manifestation but also an attribute of several qualities due to our life situation and original nature - known as Prakrti.

Relative truth is the illusion (maya) which is rajasic in nature. The absolute truth is playground of existence which is sattvik in nature whereas physical being is a manifestation of tamasic energy.

We can hopefully go further into the details of gunas in future but perhaps it is enough to understand now that our existence has three main pillars: ourself, illusion which exists temporarily and absolute truth or very fine balance between our self and real nature.

------------------

How does relative truth manifest itself in our life?

The relative truth is rajasic thus creative and related to the creator thus our self.

Therefore my illusions are just mine. My perception of self, others, family, society and future goals, ambitions makes my world and my world is always different then someone else world.

To realize the illusion or our own world, the GOAL of life is education. Education will give individual enough skills, abilities and knowledge to achieve our world.

--------------------

How absolute truth manifests in our life?

This is sattvik and always perfectly balanced thus providing stability to continue our existence. It is a link of our prakrti to eternal prakrti. This is not about an individual world but a shared world. To live in shared world, the GOAL of life is dharma so that we strike fine balance with ourselves and others who makes up the real world.

Thus, education can vary in how it drives the individual, but dharma is a common code which everyone should follow to have a balance in life with others. The rise of adharma would simply mean indifferent conduct to other and would create imbalances thus threatening the very of self, or the object of existence.

-----------------

Why is Dharma goal of our life along with Artha, Kama & Moksha?

It is natural to chase our world and one will most likely follow an efficient and effective mean to individual achievement and survival. But it is not easy to realize that too much individualism can create disharmony in the society and nature. Thus, dharma has to be goal of life to live and let others live and strike a balance with nature.

To add further, the dharma should be based on absolute truth. We could ignore and let all such traditions and beliefs go which are specific to certain time and social realities.


* I may or may not agree with the views of guest writers, but I respect their right to be heard.

Friday, 30 August 2013

Krishna – the Eternal Ideal


Please welcome guest writer* Dr Harsh Chaturvedi, currently at the Department of Physics at the Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune. Harsh holds a Doctorate in Optical Science and Engineering from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte.  His blog post is a far cry from his dissertation which was on “Photon Induced Effects in Molecular Assemblies of Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes”!! Recently honoured with the Ramanujan Fellowship by Department of Science and Technology (DST, India), Harsh is deeply interested in and inspired by Indian Philosophy. One of the most enlightened Hindus I have had the pleasure of interacting with, you can follow him on Twitter  




Philosophy of Upanishads is characterized by a rational temper, a passion for the welfare of the human beings and spirit of harmony which applied to whole world and every human being. Though impersonal abstract, aspects of this philosophy have been personified idealized by galaxy of personalities born in this land, our motherland. Among these Ram and Krishna have been the brightest ones who have influenced the Indian thought life and culture in many profound ways.  Krishna means 'black'. Krishna was also beautiful hence we call him as "Shyamsundara' the 'black-beautiful'. One "beautiful" who has mesmerized us for generations the 'black' has been an enigma too for thousands of years.  This land has produced the greatest of men, the kings, Gyanis, yogis, how many of them we remember today? There has to be something eternal to life of these that withstood the test of time not over just centuries but thousands of years and under dynamically changing society with varied interests. He was as relevant then as he is now.  HE is not burden on history but is breath of our society, living through traditions and times.

Krishna has entered, not only into religion and philosophy, but also into mysticism poetry painting sculpture music dancing and all aspects of Indian folkfore. To say the least he has mesmerized a whole generations. Where else can one seek the reason of this then in his great character and noble life? And yet, it is strange irony that no other person in India's history and culture has been subjected to foul criticism based on either incomplete incorrect understanding of facts available, if not a deliberate distortion of the same to serve an ulterior purpose.

We come across several Krishnas in the scriptures. The Rigveda (1.116.23) mentions one Krishna, the father of Visvakya. The last mandal of same work (10.42-44) attributes two suktas to sage Krishna. We also find mention of Krishna Angirasa in Kausitaki Brahmana (30.9) and a Krishna Harita in Aitareya Aranyaka (3.26). Then there is Krishna Dvaipayana also called Vyasa, the celebrated author of epic Mahabharata. It can safely be assumed none of these Krishnas is the Krishna, as we know him. However, the Chandogya Upanishad (3.17.6) mentions Krishna -Devakiputra as a disciple of Ghora Angiras, by whom Krishna was taught the science of Purusayajna. It is very likely this is same Krishna the son of Vasudeva and Devaki. However, even at the time of epic Mahabharata, Krishna was well known not only as a very great person but even deserving worship as manifestation of the divine. As a matter of fact, Indian scholars D.S Triveda and K.S.Narayanachar conclude the date of Mahabharata to be 3206 B.C and 3067 B.C.

There are four primary source of Krishna 's story - the Mahabharata and its adjunct Harivamsa, the Vishnupurana and Bhagvata. The story is also referred in Brahmapurana, PadmaPurana and Brahmavaivarta-purana. In Mahabharat, Krishna appears for the first time during the marriage of Draupadi with the Pandavas. Though casual references about his earlier life have been mentioned no details are given. To make up for this Harivamsa was added as adjunct, later. It is fairly long work of over 16000 verses and deals with story of Krishna in great detail in section called Vishnuparva. Vishnupurana (300 AD, 6000 verses) is one of earliest puranas and deals with the story of Krishna in fifth section. Bhagvata (600 AD; 18000 verses) seems to be expanded version of the Vishnupurana dealing in much great detail.

Whether Krishna Vasudeva was "Super" Human being or God Incarnate there is no gainsaying in fact that he has been ruling hearts of millions of hindus for over three millennia. If a person can make such a profound impact on the Hindu race affecting its psyche and ethos and all aspects of its life for centuries he is no less than the God. And the Hindus do believe that he was an avtara. An Avtara or incarnation of God is not a product of history but creates it shapes it. The primary purpose of avtara as Krishna himself has stated in Gita (4.7, 8) is to re-establish dharma or righteousness on a firm foundation. Throughout his life, Krishna sole concern was dharma to uphold it, to protect it and to reassert its supremacy and to unravel its mystery whenever it became inscrutable.

Dharma becomes just an ethereal concept unless it lives in the minds and hearts of human beings expressed through actions. Krishna’s life shows his concern for everybody around with no discrimination. The care he bestowed on cowherds of Vrindavan , curing Kubja,  protecting honour of Draupadi or his bestowal of wealth on the poor Kucela, washing sudama's feet and so many more incidences, all reveal his grace. Krishna though possessing heart "softer than a flower" could exercise terrific valour in defence of dharma. In fact he was the strongest man and the greatest warrior of his times. He knew no fear nor tasted defeat at any time in his life. He killed demons even as a toddler, he was the one requested not to take up arms himself from either side in Great War of Mahabharata.

All the same he was not the war-monger. He was a master statesman, skilled in the art of peace too. He was interested in peace, but not the cost of dharma. There is a common belief that brain and brawn cannot go together. But Krishna was extraordinary exception. His scholarship in the Vedic lore secular sciences, politics arts was renowned. His three Gitas the BhagvadGita, the Anugita and the Uddhavagita are standing monuments to his learning and wisdom. Intelligence and learning do not necessarily lead to culture and refinement. Arrogance is a more common result. But Krishna was a perfect gentleman. When he killed Kansa or got Jarasandha eliminated, he put Ugrasena and Sahadeva on thrones. He was the first to honour elders, brahmans and sages. Even in the face of grave provocation he could be calm; the remarkable tolerance he exhibited towards the cantankerous Sisupala or Duryodhana is a case to the point.

Krishna was not only a philosopher but an accomplished Yogi or mystic as well; hence the epithet 'Yogesvara'. The Bhagvata narrates several incidents where in he has displayed yogic powers. Mysticism and activism rarely go together; but in Krishna, they did. From cradle to grave, his life was one continuum of dynamic activity; but always for the good of others and never for himself. He was very personification of selflessness, he lived ever for others.   Krishna as a rule followed old customs and time honoured traditions but if in his judgement any custom needs to be altered he would unhesitatingly do so.  He stopped worship of Indra by cow herds and substituted with worshipping cows and Govardhan hill which were backbone of their agrarian society.

Above all, Krishna was intensely human. He responded to every human emotion in an appropriate way. His parents Devaki Vasudeva, his foster parents Yasoda and Nanda his mates at Gokula and Vrindavan the Gopis, his wives like Rukmini and Satyabhama, the Pandavas the elders of Hastinapur, even cows, horses in fact everyone that came in touch with him was never left untouched by his magic. It is but natural he was called 'Purusottama' the best of human beings.

Does Krishna who staked his life to defend and protect weak defenceless ones, himself need

defence? It appears so, on the face of it, if only we look at the spate of criticism and abuses heaped upon him by the aliens to Indian culture or de-cultured Indians themselves, who are aliens in their own society. At the outset, one thing has to be made clear. The criticisms levelled against Krishna are based on the story as depicted in the Mahabharata and the Bhagvata. These two works have declared not just the greatness the divinity of Krishna in no uncertain terms calling him as the supreme lord Himself. If the detractors of Krishna accept as true only those parts of these works that come in handy for their criticism and conveniently ignore the rest , they are no wiser than the guy who wanted to cut an egg into two halves , keep one half for hatching chicken and use the other for eating !


The criticisms fall under two broad categories: those pertaining to his relationship with the gopis of Vrindavan and those related to the various stratagems he adopted to get victory for the Pandavas. The former is related to well- known incidents as given in Bhagvata: gopivastrapaharana (snatching away clothes of Gopis) and Rasalila. Neither the Vishnupurana nor Harivamsa refers to first episode. Second is dealt with in all three works.



In the first incidence, the gopis were kumarikas (10.22.1) undergoing Katayanivrata (10.22.4) and Krishna was just seven years old (vide 10.26.3) Hope that gives perspective to perverted minds. Having seen for themselves all the super-human acts of Krishna from babyhood, it was gopis who were convinced of his greatness and divinity. This attitude of soul towards divine is well known as kantabhava or madhurbhava in the works on devotion and mysticism.  It is very much present in Christianity and Sufism too.  One who wants to approach God should eschew astapasas or eight infirmities that bind a soul like ghrina (hatred)  sanka (doubts) bhaya (fear) lajja ( shame) and so on. What is depicted here is just symbolic of this of total surrender of jivas or souls to God by giving up all bonds of life; and hence should be studied in the proper perspective.  The five chapters 29 to 33 of the tenth skandha of the Bhagvata are called Rasapancadhyayi and deals exclusively with Krishna’s play with the Gopis.  And summary of the concluding part of section is stricken with remorse the gopis wail and wander pine for and pray for HIM.  After chastising them thus Krishna reappears in their midst to their great delight and dances the Rasa, multiplying himself so that each gopi has her own Krishna at same time. All the while, the people at the home of gopis have not missed them at all ! They continue to exist physically there too. Was it a play of ordinary mortal paramour or divine sport between Jiva and Shiva?  Many a mystic both of the East and the West, have cultivated this type of love towards the divine.  Andal,  Akka Mahadevi and Mira of India, St. Teresa of Avila of Spain and Rabiya of Basra , Iraq are well known mystics who prove this point.

All this is from the subjective standpoint of Krishna and the blessed gopis. From the objective standpoint did not Krishna transgress dharma? If yes, has he not set a bad example to the world for centuries?  This is exactly the question that the king Pariksit put to sage Suka, the narrator of the Bhagvata (vide 10.33.27-29) Suka in reply classifies men into three groups: the Isvaras (Lords, Incarnations), the jivanmuktas (the liberated ones) and the ordinary people.

Those who realize God in this very life are called jivanmuktas. According to the Hindu scriptures like the Upanishads, they have transcended even dharma and hence are not bound by the dos and don’ts of this world.  (Kausitaki Upanishad 3.1). These jivanmuktas get that power by meditating on the lotus feet of God. Then, what to speak of Krishna the Lord Himself! The acts of such Isvaras cannot be should not be emulated by ordinary beings. If someone can do all that Krishna did, then and only then, he like Krishna can take liberties to define the dharma!

Krishna is true to his words: “In whichever way people approach me, in the same way do I respond” If we approach him as ‘problem-Krishna’ he will create more problems. On other hand, if we approach him as the divine incarnate in human form, ever gracious he will solve all our problems, cut our karmic bondages, bestows grace and answers our prayers. The innumerable mystics and devotees of Krishna over the centuries are the standing proof of this. The one who inspired so many ideal lives can he be just an ordinary womaniser, a failed human? How can we mortals comprehend the divine Sun, when likes of Swami Vivekananda are just moon reflecting HIS divine wisdom and grace dispelling darkness of gloom and ignorance. Words can’t suffice to describe the one, whose birth itself was divinity in action. “Under the divine spell, the gates of the prison opened up, the guards slept and Yamuna ji made way for the transportation of the divine infant.”

- Janmashtami. 2013.


[The article is in spirit inspired, edited, borrowed from Swami Harshanandaji ‘s book “All about KRSNA” RK Math, Bangalore. Indebted to him. All credits to him, any fallacies or misrepresentation will be due to my limitations for which I humbly, take the responsibility.]

* I may or may not agree with the views of guest writers, but I respect their right to be heard

Tuesday, 9 July 2013

Representation of Human Beauty & Physique from Sanskrit Texts: Part- II

Welcome back guest writer* Gyanendra Narayan, whose previous article on Representation of Human Beauty & Physique from Sanskrit Texts drew record audiences! Today he continues the series.



We finished our descriptions of Tall, Dark and Handsome (TDH) in last article. Now it’s time to take a look at fairer sex & beautiful minds. In this lengthy article, still not deep and in-complete, we are going to talk beauty of women with small deviation of description about high pedestal for women , then ,sringaar, description of entry of heroines and their eyes. 

In this article we talk about Menakaa, Rambhaa, Kaalindi, Kaikeyi , Shoorpanakhaa and Sitaa. We also talk about beauty being described with words like “Thunder-strike” , “Kookoo-voice”, “eyes like Lotus”, “Big eyes”, “Eyes like infant Deer”. Read on.

If you think fairer sex is just about beauty then think twice. Our scriptures are full of praise of their every activity. Contrary to popular perception, our scriptures are full of praise of women and our feminist friends can take courage from this.

A very popular shloka from Manu Smriti , Chapter-3, Shloka-56

Yatraa naaryastu poojyante, ramante tatra devataah|
Yatraaitastu naa poojyante; sarvaastatra-afalaah kriyaah ||

It says: Gods roam at the place where women are worshipped. Where women are not worshipped all efforts in that place will be futile, without result.

Yatra naaryastu poojyante : where women are worshipped
Ramante tatra devtah : There roam-around (moves ) Gods
Yatraitastu na poojayante : where (they are ) not worshipped
Sarvastatraafalaah kriyaah : Every activity (kriyah) (there) is without result ( afalaah )

The above shloka is just to show and remove any illusion of objectification of beauty. There are many shlokas in Ramayana & Mahaabhaarta too, but focus of article being on beauty I will reserve those for future references. 

Let me quickly delve with topic/mention of sringaar. Girls take too much time in makeup & justifiably so. Our great greatest grandfather of Hindu race (Manu) wrote (in fact indirectly admonished male fraternity) very positively about this.

Manu Smriti, Chapter -3 , Shloka -62

Striyaam tu rochamaanaayaam sarvam tadra-ochate kulam|
Tasya twarochmaanaayaam sarvameva na rochate||

It says: Where women do makeup (are happy) everything in that family is good. Where women are devoid of this everything will be dull and uninteresting.

Now let’s focus on central point of our article: on the description of beauty in out scriptures and literature.  Let us start with entry of beautiful women on the panorama. Context:  After finishing his education in forest, when Raama is returning. He is being narrated about many Rishis. Here is the context of Rishi Vishwaamatira

Valmiki Raamaayan, Baalkand, Sarg : 63, Shloka : 5

Taam dadarsha Mahaatejaa Menakaam Kushikaatmajah|
Roopenaapratimaam tatra vidyutah jalade yatha||

It says: Son of Kushika, Vishwaamitra saw highly illustrious Menakaa. Her beauty was unparalleled. She was (looking like) thunder strike in the pond.

Taam dadarsha “mahaaatejaa Menakaam” Kushikaatmajah : Saw her “Highly illustrious” Menakaa , (Rishi Vishwaamitra) Son of Kushikaa
Roopenaapratinaam : Unparalleled in beauty
tatra vidyutah jalade yatha :  Like thunder strike in pond , (there it was)

Now you know the original copy of many Hindi songs with reference to Bijli.

Let us see another entry:

Context:  Rishi Vishwaamitra is continuing his ‘tapasyaa’ and Rambhaa has been sent (by; who else then perennially insecure God Indra) to disturb him.
 Valmiki Raamaayan, Baalkand, Sarg : 64, Shloka : 9

Kokilasya tu shushraav valgu vyaaharatah swanam |
Samprahristena manasaa sa chainamanvavaikshata||

It says: (After hearing) Melodious speaking tune of Kookoo Son of Kushika, Rishi Vishwaamitra, with highly gladdened heart stared at her (Rambhaa). Here voice of Rambhaa has been compared as voice of Kookoo.

Kokilasya tu shushraav:  Hearing Kookoo
Valgu vyaaharat swanam : Sounding very melodious(enjoying)
Samprahristena manasaa : With gladdened heart/mind
Sa chainamanvavaikshata : stared at (her/Rambhaa)
                                                 
After entry, let me move further with eyes:

Context:  Here lineage of Lord Raama is being described and his ancestors are being mentioned. Amongst ancestors,  there happened a King named Asit  having 2 wives. One wife gave poisonous food to co-wife (Kaalindi) to kill the unborn son.  Here, eyes of Kaalindi have been described by both Valmiki and Rishi chyawan as Lotus-eyed.

 Valmiki Raamaayan, Baalkand, Sarg : 70, Shloka : 33

Vavande Padmapatraakshi kaamkshanti sutamuttamam|
Tamarshim saabhyupaagamya kaalindi chaabhyavaadayat||

It says:  Kaalindi , “ Eyes like lotus, desirous of good son , approached and addresses with reverence to that Rishi (Chyawan)

Vavande Padmapatraakshi kaamkshanti sutamuttam : Said (lady with) eyes like lotus, desirous of good son.
Tamarshim saabhyupaagamya kaalindi cha-abhyavaadayat : Kaalindi approached /addressed that Rishi with reverence.

After Kaalindi, its turn of eyes of Kaikeyi

Context:  Kaikeyi has been instigated by Mantharaa & is now furious with the news of Lord Raam being anointed King of Ayodhyaa. Here size of eyes, big, has been treated as beautiful. In next shloka we will see more subtlety towards eyes. So Kaikeyi first;

Valmiki Raamaayan, AyodhyaaKaand, Sarg :9, Shloka :55

Tathaa protshaahitaa devi gatwaa Mantharayaa saha|
Krdohaagaram vishaalaakshi soubhagyamadagarvita||

It says: Thus instigated, she, with big eyes and mad with luxury and good fortune, went along with Mantharaa to the Palace of Anger (special designated hall to express anger in that) (see here, bad emotions are not allowed in day to day living place)

Tathaa protshaahitaa devi : Thus instigated “she”
gatwaa Mantharyaa saha : Went (to) along with Mantharaaa
Krodhaagaram vishaalaakshi : (to) the palace of anger (went that ) big eyed (lady)
soubhagyamadagarvita : Maddeded, too proud, with her good fortune

Small deviation: Big sized eyes have also been used by Lakshaman while dealing with Shoorpanakhaa, in Aranyaa kaand , Sarg 18,shloka 10. To avoid repetition, I’m not producing the shloka.We will see another reference to Shoorpanakhaa’s eye’s in next shloka.

Now, the turn of Sitaa- The goddess and the most dignified, composed and beautiful character of Raamaayana

Context: RaamSitaa and Laxman are living in forest. There comes Shoorpanakhaa with intent to marry Raama and in doing so she tries to kill Sitaa

Valmiki Ramaayan, Aranyaa kaand , Sarg : 18, shloka: 17

Iti uktwa mrigashaavakshim alat sdrish eekshnaa|
Abhyadhaawat susankrudhaa mahaa ulkaa rohinim evam ||

It says: After saying it, she with eyes like burning fire (Shoorpanakhaa) attacked on she with eyes like deer ( Sitaa). Furious she, attacked like big asteroid has fallen on Star “Rohini”.

Iti uktwa mirgashaavakshim: After saying this (on) (lady ) with eyes like Deer
Alat sdrish eekshnaa: Eyes like burning fire
Abhyadhaawat  susankrudhaa: attacked(approached fast) with full of anger
Mahaa ulkaa rohinim evam : Big asteroid has falled on Rohini.

Connect with Gyanendra on Twitter

@Gyan_

There are infinite references to each and every body part in Sanskrit with most poetic, enigmatic, sensual yet dignified ways. We have not even scratched the surface. It is rich and delighting to an extent of making you a poet. So be forewarned, you can very well become a poet if you read Sanskrit with Rasaa. 

* I may or may not agree with the opinion of guest writers, but I respect their right to be heard.